Success is only a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A multitude of people belive that fortune plays a crucial role in success. However, this is not the only factor responsible for it with hard work being a major part.For the ones who are ready to sacrifice everything for their goal luck does not bother them.Nevertheless, partially agree that luck
individuals who blame the circumstances for their failure cannot taste victory.The Italian researchers stuck a large number of hypothetical individuals ("agents") with different degrees of "talent" into a square world and let their lives unfold over the course of their entire worklife. They defined talent as whatever set of personal characteristics allow a person to exploit lucky opportunities (I've argued talent-kaufman" style="box-sizing: inherit; color: rgb(101, 101, 101); border-bottom: 1px dotted rgb(101, 101, 101); font-family: Georgia, serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">elsewhere that this is a reasonable definition of talent). talent can include traits such as intelligence, skill, motivation, determination, creative thinking, emotional intelligence, etc. The key is that more talented people are going to be more likely to get the most 'bang for their buck' out of a given opportunity (see here for support of this assumption).Principle", which predicts that a small number of people will end up achieving the success of most of the population (Richard Koch refers to it as the "80/20 principle"). In the final outcome of the 40-year simulation, while talent was normally distributed, success was not. The 20 most successful individuals held 44% of the total amount of success, while almost half of the population remained under 10 units of success (which was the initial starting condition). this is consistent with real-world data, although there is some suggestion that in the real world, wealth success is even more unevenly distributed, with just eight men owning the same wealth as the poorest half of the world
- Success is only a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss advantages of both methods and giver your opinion 61
- Vaccinating children is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 61
- Stress related illness are becoming increasingly common What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 61
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...or it with hard work being a major part.For the ones who are ready to sacrifice eve...
^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...or their goal luck does not bother them.Nevertheless, partially agree that luck individu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....Nevertheless, partially agree that luck individuals who blame the circumstances ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Individuals
...rtheless, partially agree that luck individuals who blame the circumstances for their f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... for their failure cannot taste victory.The Italian researchers stuck a large numbe...
^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e victory.The Italian researchers stuck a large number of hypothetical individuals 'agents&a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...a person to exploit lucky opportunities Ive argued talent-kaufman' style=&apos...
^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Talent
...s is a reasonable definition of talent. talent can include traits such as intelligence...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 977, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Principle&apos
...see here for support of this assumption.Principle', which predicts that a small number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1014, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...on.Principle', which predicts that a small number of people will end up achieving the succes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ich was the initial starting condition. this is consistent with real-world data, alt...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61872909699 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.82975126821 2.80592935109 136% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642140468227 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 147.955176912 49.4020404114 299% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 210.0 106.682146367 197% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.375 20.7667163134 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0840618969027 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395566065616 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323522511718 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924523848509 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461770243298 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.7 13.0946893788 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 11.3001002004 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.91 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 10.7795591182 223% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.