Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this is a positive or negative development
With the advent of technology the use of cell phones have risen especially among the students. However, these devices can play a crucial role in safety and learning but many schools have imposed a restriction on their usage in the campus. In my opinion, this a positive development which can not only improve the academic performance of students but also enhance their social interaction with colleagues and teachers.
The major benefit of restricting phone use in the classroom can improve learning. This is because there would be fewer distractions in the class. For example, when a student carry their mobile phone in school there is a constant urge to peek into the phone to check for new updates. Even the most proficient teacher cannot spot the child using the device amid the lecture. These distractions draws the attention away from the lessons and impair the concentration. A ban of mobile phones during class assists the learners to interact with the lecturer and allows them to focus.
Additionally, their engagement with other peers will also increase which will help to improve their communication skills and even discard the feeling of isolation and the solitude. For instance, if a student has a doubt in a particular concept and is unable to access the teacher they can seek assistance from their fellow mates in the school and hence clear the confusion. This reciprocity can lead to a boost in confidence and also friendship. These social benefits can only be achieved through a ban on cell phones.
In conclusion, despite phones are an integral part of our lives their usage must be limited in the school premises. With implementation of few norms regarding the operation of phones and prohibition in certain instances students are able to learn better and strengthen friendship with their peers.
- Success is only a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Stress related illness are becoming increasingly common What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 61
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this is a positive or negative development 78
- Vaccinating children is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss advantages of both methods and giver your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ractions in the class. For example, when a student carry their mobile phone in sc...
^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r cannot spot the child using the device amid the lecture. These distractions dra...
^^
Line 2, column 394, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'draw'.
Suggestion: draw
...e amid the lecture. These distractions draws the attention away from the lessons and...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...discard the feeling of isolation and the solitude. For instance, if a student has...
^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... seek assistance from their fellow mates in the school and hence clear the confus...
^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...in instances students are able to learn better and strengthen friendship with their pe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7553100249 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.964328975 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238890252364 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761368077314 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057498134708 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145539596153 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894075462065 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.