Since the advent of gadgets such as smartphones and tablets, which are mostly used for entertainment, people have been arguing about the effect on individuals and society itself. I believe that handheld devices are detrimental for people as they might cause health deterioration and affect the efficiency of employees due to addiction to smartphones.
To start with, the increase of average screen time- the mean amount of time, which is spent in front of the screen per person, promoted a commonness of eyes issues. This was concluded by the research of NHS which states that the share of people with vision deterioration in 2015 increased by 60% in comparison with 2005; in addition, this investigation found a direct correlation between the mean screen time of people and the percentage of people with vision deterioration. Hence, devices can be considered as harmful.
Furthermore, the availability of entertainment on smartphones and other portative gadgets brought an opportunity to use them more frequently in comparison with other sources of entertainment such as TV. Consequently, some people obtained addiction, which leads to lower efficiency as workers can be easily disturbed. The recent research of the University of East Anglia which was released in 2018, states that employees can waste up to two hours daily due to messengers, social networks; therefore, portative devices seems to be detrimental.
In light of the thoughts elaborated upon, I would like to conclude that handheld devices are harmful to citizens as they promote health issues and reduce the work capacity of people as they are distracted by phones and other gadgets.
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 84
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 89
- Music has been and will continue to be the universal language of mankind To what extent do you agree or disagree 51
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, so, therefore, in addition, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3320610687 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04140042469 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572519083969 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8362744487 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.222222222 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1111111111 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12273920422 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535220131276 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473339451089 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842701334591 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471363233506 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.