In the future, it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries. Is this positive or negative development?
Because of the development of life and medical equipment and health care technologies, now and in the future, the proportion of elderly people in countries is constantly increasing. Some people believe that would be a positive move. Whereas another group thinks the opposite of that. With me, I strongly opine that both of these views are correct and I will explain my view below
On the one hand, it is true that the aging have lots of experience, even though they are not from the same era or generation. However, the knowledge they have gained can help the young generation to come. Not only that but the knowledge of older people can assist the scientists, relying a lot on proverbs and idioms that reflect the knowledge that the elderly want to convey. Furthermore, aging also can help this social instill a great sense of responsibility and altruism into the young generation. "Calm before the storm," for example, has 2 meanings, but if you think about the weather, it means that sometimes there are sunny days before a storm occurs.
On the other hand, the elderly cannot earn money but they still have to eat and live or even spend money on a list of other extras. Besides that, they make their descendants more responsible, and they do so by relying heavily on government resources as well. The burden of aging is more serious. For example, every year the government spends a lot of money paying for pensions and medical expenses.
In conclusion, older people have many benefits, but they cannot avoid disadvantages
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 61
- Task 1 The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 73
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... believe that would be a positive move. Whereas another group thinks the opposite of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... generation. 'Calm before the storm,' for example, has 2 meanings, but if yo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in my view, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89694656489 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67530026601 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2808857686 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6923076923 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136342057348 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492263488046 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764695683924 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902813263546 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848774140851 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... believe that would be a positive move. Whereas another group thinks the opposite of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... generation. 'Calm before the storm,' for example, has 2 meanings, but if yo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in my view, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89694656489 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67530026601 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2808857686 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6923076923 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136342057348 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492263488046 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764695683924 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902813263546 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848774140851 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.