Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvatages?
Nowadays, it is observed that advanced technologies have altered the way that children allocate their leisure time. Apparently, this propensity may have some auspicious effects and ominous repercussions, which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, there are numerous merits that this trend could bring about. Firstly, thanks to the techologies, children are capable of approaching to apps used for entertainment purposes on the Internet easily, which enables them to unwind and enjoy their spared time. For example, it may take only a few seconds for some movies or TV series to emerge when an adolescent searches for them on Youtube or Tiktok. Hence, but for the help of technologies, kids might face with burdensome obstacles when it comes to looking for something to do during their leisure time. Furthermore, technologies would create opportunities for children to play some video games without needing to expense too much money. To illustrate, Google Play app or App Store offers a wide range of games that children are allowed to download them freely. Thus, this tendency may assist youngsters in saving up a great amount of money.
On the other hand, a vast array of factors has prevailed me on believing that this trend might be detrimental in some aspects. The first justification is that sparing too much free time on using electrical devices could pose a theat to the health of children since many researchs have concluded that the greenlight emited from these gadgets is very hazardous. For instance, a group of people have carried on a survey which shows that more and more kids in Ho Chi Minh city currently endure from hypertenssion or short-sightedness due to leveraging smartphones too much. Moreover, during spared time, many younters now are prone to make companionships with other individuals that they are not familiar with via some video games or recreational apps. It may leads to the fact that kids are affected by the bad behaviors of friends those who are not good. Nevertheless, this issue can be tackled if parents have fiercely educational methods and spend more time striking up conversations with their children.
In conclusion, admittedly, children can reap numerous benefits of applying advanced technologies on recreation in their free time; however, I have to acknowledge that this tendency might be unfavorable rather than beneficial.
- The graph and the table below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1994 to 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the stages in the recycling of aluminium drinks cans 78
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19948186528 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9257010161 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588082901554 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4074600011 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4375 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210514066461 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706075039391 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081640477357 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151239004158 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041129478204 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.