Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument.
An often contested subject is the prevalence of technology. It is claimed that in the foreseeable future, technology-driven classes will displace all teacher-led learning in the schools. To illustrate this, both sides will be analyzed.
Firstly, it would appear that replacing all human-based teachers by technology-driven ones is impossible in the not too distant future. For example, statistics have been proof that released by central researches in Iran, those students who have direct contact with their peer and instructors are, not only more creative but also productive. In other words, computer-based teachers do not have the capability to cater to a variety of student’s emotional needs and give practical examples to foster their creativity. In sum, this type of technology has more deficiency and seems to be not fruitful for students in the near future.
However, technology brings more benefit for students and predicted that in the near future it will thoroughly replace with a teacher in the school because it enables the pupil to do more practice and conveniently repeat their syllabus far more than before. For instance, some non-profit schools in Tabriz equipped their schools’ classes with modern technology which allow pupils to be in contact through a virtual environment with their teachers without leaving their homes and do more practices. In other words, technology causes students to have extra time than commuting from home to school and vice versa and allocate their times more on education and important research-based activities. In short, it is not far from the belief that this issue is practicable in all schools.
In conclusion, the use of technology is increasing rapidly in this fast-paced world and its influence can even be seen in the classroom. In the not too distant future, predicted that the ever-consuming technology replaces with teacher-based classes and this essay analyzed both sides of this view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | hakinguyen | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Hira Shaheen | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Hira Shaheen | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | alifdores | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | 0102mickey | 61 | view |
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 79
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument. 73
- Nowadays people try to balance their work with other things in life, but only some could actually achieve it so far.What are the reasons for that? How can we solve this problem? 73
- Scientists agree that many people eat too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problem can be solved by educating people, while others believe that education will not work.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people prefer cold weather conditions, while others don’t.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s issue is practicable in all schools. In conclusion, the use of technology is in...
^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ence can even be seen in the classroom. In the not too distant future, predicted t...
^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essay analyzed both sides of this view.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38762214984 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08978903042 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550488599349 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6567619853 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.230769231 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311864478439 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128004653648 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109743333838 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237296800029 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128167326787 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.