Television has changed the quality of life for an ordinary person Do you agree or disagree

It is undeniable fact that the contribution of television has made advancements in individuals’ life. It is often argued that television has affected the quality of lifestyle among people. However, I firmly disagree with this given notion. I think it has improved the awareness of people about the community.

Firstly, the TV set is the primary source of entertainment, any person can watch movies and series without leaving the comfort of their homes. For example, instead of going to the movie theatre I simply can buy an online package of movies from a vendor such as Netflix, Amazon prime, and Tata Sky to watch as many movies of my choice. Secondly, several programs on the TV show informative knowledge about different things such as cooking programs, discovery channels, and national geographic channels. Thirdly, we can improve the language skills along with general knowledge by watching the news that shares worldwide information.

Furthermore, the encouragement and motivation have gained by youngsters by watching different competition shows. Finally, on weekends, the family enjoys watching television together for spending quality family time. For instance, in my family, we mostly watch comedy shows on weekends. Plus, we prepare food together by watching programs on TV. In this way, I enjoy the ample amount of time with my family. Therefore, television has provided a hub of knowledge and fun in our lives.

In conclusion, as I said, the TV has improved the quality of people by sharing informative knowledge about the world and provided an enormous source of entertainment.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31496062992 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95757087733 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594488188976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1228735386 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14220451533 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462955377053 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456082579349 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903294098922 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388228547951 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.