There are both advantage and disadvantage of company workers accessing their own products and services. Discuss.
Recently the phenomenon of granting accsess to own products of company workers has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of using services by employees is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I highly believe that commercial policies can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using productions of a company by its labors can provide the society with noticable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of the quality improvement are crucial. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of a factory production management . Thus, beneficial ramifications of high-quality services are visible.
From a scientific point of view, selling goods to the factory workers can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that demerits of non-standard productions are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described the role of services development. Hence, predicted outcomes of outdated products are noticable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using products and services of a firm by its workers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of commercial policies prove the significance of advertisement analysis, but also pinpoint its implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tance of a factory production management . Thus, beneficial ramifications of high-...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63524590164 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27296041643 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602459016393 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5910440279 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255235425715 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839988534887 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571784847312 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141095256279 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232658844164 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.