There are both advantage and disadvantage of company workers accessing their own products and services. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of company employees' access to their products and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of employment policies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that manufacturing strategies can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using producted items by workers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of job offers are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered producers' requirements. Hence, beneficial ramifications of the company products legislation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, availability of goods for company's labors might increase the consequences of products' quality inspection. Moreover, fundamental aspects of higher-quality goods could relate to this reality that the demerits of the quality assurance are negatively correlated. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a presitigious university has demonstrated the downsides of employees' satisfaction. Thus, it is not correct to presume the preconceived notions of business owners.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of company products accessablity of products far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of qualified products prove the significance of an effective company management procedure but also pinpoint implications of future products
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, using producte...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... legislation apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, availabilit...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onceived notions of business owners. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85098039216 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36545080652 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662745098039 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1604257288 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245322633362 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721991626792 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069312571374 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128318236633 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622689445389 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.