There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
There has been an increasing trend of working and studying from home since the development of information technology. Some people consider it toxic because it takes away people’s face to face interaction. However, for others it is a chance to improve their situations and this is where I lay my thoughts.
Studying and working from home may bring several benefits. First of all, reducing the time spent on commuting meaning that we can save a lot of money for transportation and have more time to rest. This will lead to limit people on the street, reduce traffic congestions and accidents. Secondly, people may work flexibly at anytime, anywhere that they find the most productive. We can choose to do a certain amount of work per day rather than sticking at the office desk for eight hours without actually doing anything.
The benefit of accessible and cheap technology is that it opens door for people from low socioeconomic areas to change their lives. Many prestigious universities around the world are offering free courses on academic platforms for everyone to access. People from high mountains or remote areas can acquire knowledge through modern technologies. Also disable children can learn to read or write without having to leave their home which makes home schooling easier than ever.
It is true that face-to-face contact is important in human relationships, and the computers make people spend a significant amount of time on the internet that cause a decrease in human interactions. However, with all benefits mentioned above, I believe the advancement of technology has more positive impacts on our lives than the negativity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, as to, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15671641791 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84103997349 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649253731343 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2602600405 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234524149777 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724911006094 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618304099974 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125850017724 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208126871852 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.