There is a belief that supermarkets and manufacturers have a duty to reduce the packaging of products they sell. Others argue that consumers must avoid buying products with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give yours.
Several people believe that manufactures and stores are responsible for reducing packaging products that they sale. Meanwhile, others opine avoiding for buying products which is using lots of packaging is consumers’ duty. In my perspective, however, I consider that companies have responsibility to decrease the material use to wrap their products. In this essay, I will explain both of arguments and deliver my own opinion further.
On the one hand, there are several reason why company has obligation to reduce the number of packaging for their products. Firstly, company and supermarkets have a great influence mainly for controlling the number of plastic waste around the world caused by packaging on their products. For instance, creating the rules, which are related to reducing or limiting packaging use, could be implemented by the factories. Secondly, changing the basic material, from plastic to eco-friendly material, of the packaging could be beneficial for the company in which, recently, the green-peace campaign arise in every corner of states forcing company and people to avoid deliberately the products which use plastic. Therefore, company should take a step for taking this issues exclusively for their own interest.
On the other hand, there is an argument why people should take their roles for reducing their consumption especially for unnecessary packaging on the products. First and foremost, people as the main consumers can take the most important role for evading several products which still use no-eco-friendly warping products. Moreover, company, for stabilizing their revenues, would reducing the material for warping their products so that they wouldn’t lost their consumers. Nevertheless, every now and then, people are being difficult to avoiding the products, inasmuch as the products are predominantly warping by plastic or others non-eco-friendly material. Therefore, even though people can be participated in this problems; yet, their influences still less in comparing with the producers.
To sum up, company and supermarket have wide influence for regulating the packaging use which is, at the same time, it could be brought to the advantages for companies themselves. Other views, people have a role for reducing the number of packaging use while the influence of them are not as impactful as the producers.
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary cause of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 67
- There is a belief that supermarkets and manufacturers have a duty to reduce the packaging of products they sell Others argue that consumers must avoid buying products with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give yours 51
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age Some sociologist claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example Discuss the causes and 73
- In many countries the cost of living are rising What are the effects of this on individuals and society Suggest solutions to this problem 73
- The dangers of smoking are well known yet many people continue with this habit What are the causes of this How can we reduce smoking in society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...responsibility to decrease the material use to wrap their products. In this essay, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
..., for stabilizing their revenues, would reducing the material for warping their products...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[4]
Message: The verb 'wouldn't' requires base form of this verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...ng their products so that they wouldn’t lost their consumers. Nevertheless, every no...
^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...n’t lost their consumers. Nevertheless, every now and then, people are being difficult to avoiding...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...en though people can be participated in this problems; yet, their influences still l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53462603878 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97831214439 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506925207756 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0210125242 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211598766295 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09453002035 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764332140411 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164638878337 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675821035125 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.