These days free music and free films are available online Is it a positive or a negative development

Essay topics:

These days free music and free films are available online.
Is it a positive or a negative development?

The last two decades have witnessed enormous progress in the field of technology thus making entertainment better and more convenient for people to avail. Hence, many movies and music albums are accessible online free of cost. This development comes with both pros and cons which shall be discussed further with relevant averments and examples.

On the one hand, movies and songs available online free of cost does have some benefits. To begin with, today everyone has access to internet and smartphones. It becomes quite handy and feasible for a person to rejuvenate himself anytime and anywhere with the help of these two facilities. If entertainment is chargeable, people would refrain from watching it. Furthermore, many production houses broadcast their shows or programs to gain popularity. This also provides a platform for junior artists to showcase their talents which is not possible in the main industry.

On the other hand, the option of non-chargeable music and films present on world wide web do come with certain drawbacks. Firstly, it is evident that the cost of producing any video is exorbitant. When these are provided free to the public, it eventually results in losses to the production companies. Secondly, it is often observed that people spend a lot of their time watching series or other shows. This not only wastes their precious time but also has a deleterious effect on their health and psychology.

To conclude, I would like to reiterate that anything that is available to mankind free of cost do have both positive and negative consequences on them. It depends upon them how they utilize the services bestowed to them either by nature or other people in the society.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-27 123456abcxyz 73 view
2024-03-26 mxhit6792922 61 view
2024-03-26 mxhit6792922 61 view
2024-03-25 minhnhat2002 73 view
2024-02-27 reverjae 67 view
Essays by user Ripon03 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun production seems to be countable; consider using: 'many productions'.
Suggestion: many productions
... refrain from watching it. Furthermore, many production houses broadcast their shows or program...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12186379928 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72422183703 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616487455197 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2699329082 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.3125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221448092221 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616408924111 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844043699013 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123702912823 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245084731508 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.