These days Internet is easy accessible to children Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

These days Internet is easy accessible to children. Is this a positive or negative development?

At the present time, people are having arduous time reaching reaching to the assimilation of a consensus in whether the internet on children's hand is a positive or negative trend. Though there are some robust altercations against, nevertheless, I confide that internet is benignant for childrens. However, I shall scrutinies my epistemology in the subsequent essay.

There are some major factors to uphold the idea of supporting internet for childrens. The primary contention that needs to be taken into consideration is, children can use this on a efficacious way for their study. There is no denying that in this contemporary world everything relys on internet and school going childrens may get the benefits by searching about their academic course on google. For example, childrens wheb they came back to the home after their school, that time they can get more information about their class subject from youtube. Youtube is a place where thry caj have virtual class.

Apart from that, another reason is, children can spend their spare timr playing some IQ related games on online. It is widely acknowledged that IQ games boost children's brain and make them better concentrator. For instance, if a children pass his leisure time playing such games are likely to become sharp thinker by a research.

However, despite the above arguments, there are some people who deem that internet is a curse for children. They opine that, children through internet cab adopt many mischievous lesson. Such as, watching adult movies or misusing time browsing that. Owing to which, they become worsened for the society.

In conclusion, thoroughly it can not be repudiated that internet have some drawbacks for children but I believe the merits are way more than the demerits of it.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-03 susanti 61 view
2024-06-07 awu212 view
2024-06-07 awu212 view
2024-06-07 awu212 view
2024-06-07 awu212 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: reaching
...nt time, people are having arduous time reaching reaching to the assimilation of a consensus in w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...sideration is, children can use this on a efficacious way for their study. There ...
^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...m better concentrator. For instance, if a children pass his leisure time playing such game...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...s are likely to become sharp thinker by a research. However, despite the above argument...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18055555556 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71025572799 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607638888889 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0799525316 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1799437243 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579235622409 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465370600804 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101755706634 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270889339417 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.