These days much of the foods people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe that it would be better for the environment and the economy if
people only consume food produced by local farmers.
Would the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
The advent of food transportation has made different it available in every part of the world. While some people think that shipping food a miles away from where it was grown negatively
affects the environment and the economy, others argue that it is not important. This essay will suggest that the advantages of buying food from the local communities, namely reduced
greenhouse gases emissions and economical support of the agricultural sector, outweigh the flawed argument about the lack of nutritional values in a locally-sourced ingredients.
Air transport is one of the biggest polluters of the planet and the portion of agricultural air shipping in it substantially outweighs others, such as tourists flights. Furthermore, additional fossil fuels are wasted on delivering the agricultural goods from the farm to the airport. The study done by King’s College London in 2020 revealed that 60% of the environmental harm in the UK is coming from the transportation industry. Additionally, it is important to remember that products that are sold abroad will be taxed by those governments, leading to a lower income of local producers. This drives prices higher and can easily create a spiralling inflation, lowering the disposable income of the population. For example, Poland, who is one of the main exporters of grain, reported the highest level of inflation among European Union countries last year.
Other people disagree and feel that their shopping options are limited without international trade. This can be the case for smaller countries, who do not produce enough food, however, there is no evidence that reducing the consumption options to what grows on the native soil is harmful. For instance, it is proven that our ancestors, who hunted only where they lived, had better health than an average person today, eating something delivered from another hemisphere.
On balance, a localised approach to food consumption backed by an environmental cautiousness and economical stability is definitely more advantageous than a desire to eat a rainbow throughout the year.
- These days much of the foods people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away Some people believe that it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consume food produced by local farmers Would the advantages 89
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Carribean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti social behaviour and lack of respect for others What might have caused this situation How to improve it 73
- Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti social behaviour and lack of respect for others What might have caused this situation How to improve it 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...reduced greenhouse gases emissions and economical support of the agricultural sector, out...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ed by an environmental cautiousness and economical stability is definitely more advantageo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39755351682 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05818042718 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633027522936 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7796966115 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.769230769 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247887936712 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699965909906 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541962333548 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114693722291 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725671225536 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.