The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Carribean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Carribean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided line graph depicts how many tourists travelled to one Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.

Overall, data reveals that this island was a popular touristic destination, and that the number of tourists increased more than threefold during the period. While the number of visitors staying on cruise ships increased substantially, the trend for the number of those who lived on the island was more erratic, rising marginally in the end.

At the outset of the period, there were 250,000 people spending their time on ships and 750,000 living in the island hotels. By the 2013, as many as 1.5 million people chose to spend time on this Caribbean territory, taking the total number of individuals visiting to 2 million.

The most notable change was the inversion of trajectories in the number of cruise ships inhabitants and guests who stayed on the island. In the middle of 2016, there was an equal number of visitors spending time on ships and on the land, bringing the total to just below 3 million. Finally, in 2017, the was a marked increase in tourists, totalling to 3.5 million people, that were represented by 2 million cruise ship passengers and 1.5 million residing on the island.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-13 khanhlinh2011 78 view
Essays by user edmitric :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erratic, rising marginally in the end. At the outset of the period, there were ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94581280788 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56340404672 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6619461968 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149526757866 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746671513411 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423108730546 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103881633686 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436309606718 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.