The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts and table provide data on the structure of UK government budget from 2017 to 2018, disclosing the structure of expenditures and revenues accordingly.
Overall, the total number of income has been increasing during the period, so as the contributions from all relevant sources, with the noticeable inflows coming from National Government and Local Taxes. As for the budget spending, while about two thirds was allocated to officers and staff salaries, small part of their compensation was redirected for technological improvements.
In 2018, the Police Budget received additional 13 million pounds, reaching 319 million in total. Supported by the amount of 178 million received from the government sources, it also benefited from the impressive 20 million rise in taxes collected. Sums from grants and other sources remained steady, hovering around 38 million.
he most noticeable change in spending structure was a reduction in staff compensation in favour of technology. Nevertheless, even after this slight drop, salaries’ percentage remained close to 70%, compared to 17% allocation to buildings and transport, which didn’t change at all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 84
- Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti social behaviour and lack of respect for others What might have caused this situation How to improve it 73
- Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti social behaviour and lack of respect for others What might have caused this situation How to improve it 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Carribean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- These days much of the foods people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away Some people believe that it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consume food produced by local farmers Would the advantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... steady, hovering around 38 million. he most noticeable change in spending stru...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, nevertheless, so, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64772727273 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01783181842 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681818181818 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8495716012 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142590658177 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580262640494 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529123189954 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865762604127 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059637305624 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.