Time is changing and people’s tastes and interests as well, accordingly many individuals spend the amount of money to buy a festival or game ticket which could have more positive effects.
On the bright side, buying events vouchers by people could help the organizer to run the show perfectly and make the opportunity for unemployed people to find a real position on the events. For example, people who handle the Olympics games have always been hired a number of groups for participating in the opening show on the Olympic game, like dancers, acrobatic professionals, technical assistance team, makeup artists, dress designers and etc, so that all of these people working for the main organization and selling tickets actually help to pay involved people salary. In addition, attending people on such events and matches raise social solidarity. Obviously, the sports team needs the fans to support in the stadiums to give them hope and motivation for playing their best on the game, like a football game or basketball and half all game results depend on cheering their fans. Last but not least every society could be improving the foundation when the government receiving a tax percentage of tickets sell profit and using this money to build a new school or stadium and other facilities for the community.
On the negative side, waste such a huge amount of money on sports games could provide opportunities to steal money by the competition organizer from their team. As an illustration, some league managers are involved in crimes like money embezzlement from the team and hide in secret bank accounts so the players get nothing from ticket income as team members. Furthermore, people who spent money on games and events wasting their precious time. For instance, Tv channels always support these events as live programs and people could easily stay at home and watch the show with his resolution and every angles like Oscar Award or World Cup.
In conclusion, although there are many disadvantages to this development, in point of my view, money that comes from people's interest in watching games personally could build our society better in many ways and lowering the rate of unemployment in countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, furthermore, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69170631319 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585164835165 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8598505772 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0909090909 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184438283511 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754029108946 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326360336917 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116338904204 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283692704404 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.