These days young children spend a lot of time using computers tablets and smart phones Some people think that introducing children to technology at a young age is beneficial others believe that they would benefit more from playing traditional games Discus

Nowadays, kids spend most of their time using gadgets. A section of society believe that using technology in early age is useful. On the contrary, few state that they would benefit more from physical activities. I will elucidate both the points and provide my standpoint towards the end.

Technology is the need of an hour and it is essential for everyone to get exposed to it. However, if kids are exposed to it from an early age can lead to numerous delirious effects like anxiety disorders, psychosomatic ailments, poor vision, etcetera. In addition to, children emphasize only on using smart tools neglecting food resulting in malnourishment. Kids refrain themselves from studies altering them from passing with flying colours. On the other hand there are few individuals who surf games on variety of online platforms to earn themselves bread and butter. There are ample of educational portals which can be used efficiently to improve one's cognitive abilities.

To embark with, physical activities can be used to in cultivate moral values. For an instance, playing a game with other fellow can sow seeds of sportsmanship, discipline, etcetera. Recent studies claim that younger ones who spend time on physical fitness tend to have lesser risk of developing diseases caused due to sedentary lifestyles. There are children who persuade their dreams in sports and gained fame as well as wealth. For an instance, Mahendra Singh Dhoni was keen to play cricket ever since he was child and burned midnight oil to upscale his skills which made him the most prominent player of his time. However, one must maintain a homeostasis between playing games and studies.

To summarize while, it is essential to keep oneself abreast of recent technology I personally believe that young minds should be kept apart from smart tools in order to live their childhood to its fullest.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun state seems to be countable; consider using: 'few states'.
Suggestion: few states
...n early age is useful. On the contrary, few state that they would benefit more from physi...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while, apart from, in addition, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12745098039 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70476319567 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.320984676 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2941176471 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222777868321 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637038522551 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428378588653 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131205822123 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383638606849 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.