The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The world is always in change and the technology is the main force of this path. The more advances are made, more energy is needed for their use and the proportion of this required energy is not exactly equal.Because of this huge power demand, researches seek to find new clean energy sources and in the nineteenth century the nuclear power was discovered.

Since then, this source has been used as a clean model of power generation, but it is not so that clean. This type of power plant heats water from rivers inside their generators and returns the hot water to the watercourse. As a result of this temperature imbalance the aquatic environment can be harmed.

In addition, this power source has its type of trash. In this case, the radioactive trash needs a proper destination and for this, big deposits are used to retain them. Clearly with the reasons above, nuclear energy should not be called “clean”.
Moreover, this storage can cause the emergence of diseases such as cancer and nuclear accidents could leave areas uninhabitable.

In support of this, the uranium, the main type of nuclear garbage, can so far be used as a weapon. In fact, few kilos of this element are needed to build an atomic bomb. The threat of bombs can undoubtedly maintain peace but it is peace by fear and this is not the type of unity the world needs.

In other words, I disagree that the nuclear power is a cheap and clean energy and I agree with the statement that nuclear weapons maintain world’s “peace” but I do not think pacification would be achieved in this way.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Because
...is required energy is not exactly equal.Because of this huge power demand, researches s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...turns the hot water to the watercourse. As a result of this temperature imbalance ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80363636364 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74629487441 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534545454545 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2575318398 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21457752741 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796894375141 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799768797109 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126884648018 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845477983268 0.056905535591 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.