The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace Nuclear power provides a cheap and clear replacement for existing energies The benefits far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides a cheap and clear replacement for existing energies. The benefits far outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the current era, with the developement and improvement of producing different types of energy suitable for different purpose. Some people think that the threat of nuclear weapons helps to maintains world peace and the nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. I totally agree with that thougt, and I think that the benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages. And the essay below will clarify my point of view to some extent.
Nuclear energy is really an extremely necessary energy source for us in particular and the world in general. In fact, without this energy source, it would be difficult for the world to maintain world peace. Such as some countries can improve and handle the nuclear weapons well, the countries that are weaker in this regard will fear and dare not attack, so it will lead to peace among countries in the world. Some countries that have the ability to process and use this energy very well today are Russia, China, Korea, and the United States. And the maintenance of peace between countries is due to the United Nations, which allows countries to sign a treaty with each other not to wage war between countries.
Beside that, using nuclear technology for creation of energy which is not only cheap but a environmental friendly. This creates many benefits like mitigating climate change, plastic watse recycling. The power generated from a nuclear reactions costs less than the hydroelectric or oil generated electricity. Some other benefits such as nuclear energy can be used to create some other energy sources to serve human life. Futhermore, it also provides an storablt source of as well. For example, the Russians are at the top in utilising nuclear resources for the betterment of mankind.
In conclusion, I strongly support to the use of nuclear energy sources. And the world has become peaceful and has also overcome the crises of energy shortage, by correct usage of nuclear reactors.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-28 dhuy 73 view
Essays by user dhuy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'maintain'.
Suggestion: maintain
... the threat of nuclear weapons helps to maintains world peace and the nuclear power provi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n of energy which is not only cheap but a environmental friendly. This creates ma...
^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...uman life. Futhermore, it also provides an storablt source of as well. For example...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in general, in particular, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04024767802 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57934316201 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532507739938 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7254182305 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7647058824 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361582399769 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117669284562 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884582358065 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233216636931 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722600976687 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.