Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as friends, help at work and at home. Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, different kinds of artificial intelligence and robots are assisting people in many aspects of their life. In my opinion, this is a negative development that can affect people in many aspects of their life.
The first reason why this is a negative is that the extensive use of machines can result in overdependence, and thus people are opting for a more sedentary lifestyle. To illustrate, before the rise of technological devices, people used to be more fit and healthy by doing various house chores such as washing the dishes and other domestic tasks. However, in the presence of automated devices, people are becoming physically inactive and spending more time watching television or playing video games. Therefore, inactivity of this kind can lead to medical issues including obesity and heart disease.
Another issue is that workers are losing their jobs due to increasing automation in different industries and factories. In other words, robots and machines are replacing employees that perform routine manual tasks because they are capable of handling a larger workload in a short period. For instance, restaurants in Japan use robots instead of waiters because they are self-sufficient and can take orders instantaneously. Consequently, there is a significant rise in unemployment worldwide. Furthermore, the maintenance and repair of robots can be expensive and unaffordable and programs need to be updated according to daily requirements. For example, electronic devices can frequently break down and malfunction, and thus they require extensive repairs which cost copious amounts of money.
In conclusion, although automated devices can aid people in diverse and daily tasks, excessive reliance on such gadgets can result in obesity, unemployment and monetary issues. For this reason, I am convinced that utilising robots is a negative trend in general.
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as friends help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Most major cities around the world continue to grow at a phenomenal rate due to the massive increase in population This has led to a general decline in the quality of life in city areas as the environment becomes more crowded and polluted Give some reason 84
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities Do the advantages of information technology outweigh the drawbacks 89
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why is this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51557093426 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05885484335 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3274299792 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178657627553 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610640686129 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476293682987 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108860538544 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268685927067 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.