Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development

The number of countries which import food from other nations are increasing in recent years. In my point of view, this trend shows a positive development. This essay will discuss the reasons which lead to this assertion.
To begin with, importing other culture's food will produce production expenses as well as risks. To have a finished product, several processes are required. The money which is paid for each step is not a small number. For example, a standard chocolate bar will cost money in planting, harvesting the cacao fruit, hiring workers, or buying machines. Meanwhile, importing one is much more elemental and cheap. Following that, the land which was used in food-producing will be implemented in other fields, such as education or industry. For instance, a whole school could be constructed on the land which was a wheat field or a flour manufactory.
Furthermore, using overseas food is an encouraging way to learn and discover other religion's sustenance or the methods they used for production. If a country restricts people from approaching other nation's cultures, citizens of that country will not be able to know anything but old-fashioned or traditional meals. According to a discovery reported by a vlogger, residents in North Korea have no idea about pizza or sushi-two of the most well-known dishes in the world. Last but not least, accepting new dishes will gain an opportunity for foreign restaurants and chefs. A prime example, a Japanese chef can open a sushi restaurant in a country which passionate about it, such as China or America. Moreover, this will show a significant contribution to food abundance and cultural diversity.
In conclusion, opening a vision to other religion's food is a fundamental method to improve a country economy and connect nations.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'religions'' or 'religion's'?
Suggestion: religions'; religion's
...uraging way to learn and discover other religions sustenance or the methods they used for...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'religions'' or 'religion's'?
Suggestion: religions'; religion's
...n conclusion, opening a vision to other religions food is a fundamental method to improve...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15807560137 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94771256077 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6282281795 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2941176471 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177060918668 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573777269197 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537900500597 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123143014056 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691280861002 0.056905535591 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.