Today, in many countries people are living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short time and then thrown away. What do you think is the cause and what problems will it lead ?
Owing to contemporary society, people tend to discard the stuff after a short life cycle which is existed in economically developed areas. From my viewpoint, two key factors are driving the phenomenon as concerned.
In terms of mass production, this is a significant boosting the portion of consuming at a lower and reasonable cost that is not grid of obstacles purchasing items at all. Indeed, household durables such as air condition or fridges or television are more affordable to possess in domestic users with an average income. As a consequence, it is offered more comfortable and timesaving in different families as it leads to their willingness to eliminate the obsolete things in a straightforward. What is more about a fashionable item such as clothes and accessories, the strategy of firms is gradually growing in the market that is contributing the launched these features which are customers forced themselves to catch up a new trend.
There is a detrimental impact on the environment and the waste of natural resources are foremost direct to the result of this trend. A pile of exaggeration rubbish is generated day by day; it is assumed that it is needed to landfill. Moreover, plastic bottles and bags are still these lands which are not likely to recycle in the following years. Meanwhile, to adapt to the meet of high demand for consumer goods, the increase in industrial waste is pushing off depleting resources.
Overall, it should be alerted to the raise awareness to give this current problem faced by many countries. Eventually, there is draining the earth at an astonishing speed does not good to survive human beings, thus, alleviating the thrown away culture is a triumph to society in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ess to eliminate the obsolete things in a straightforward. What is more about a fashionable item ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is a triumph to society in the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05244755245 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00286144853 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2915640393 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.416666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927492254735 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250092012603 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268448535887 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0479411596752 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283377307571 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.