Today, many people do not realise how important the natural world is.
Why is this?
How can people learn more about the importance of the natural world?
In recent decades, there has been a growing phenomenon that citizens’ awareness of the wild world’ importance substantially decreases over periods of time. Given that the trend has potential for significant negative impacts, identifying the reason is the key to find solutions.
There are a variety of reasons for little understanding about natural world of individuals. First, due to the gradual development of cities as well as metropolitan areas, a great number of individuals would tend to live distantly from the natural habitats in order to meet their demands for either occupations or education. Consequently, this acts as a deterrent for citizens to enjoy the beauty of the flora and fauna, translate into no necessity of citizens’ knowledge about the planet in which they are residing. Second, since the academic knowledge is excessively emphasized in several nations’ education systems, learners would experience a lack of practices in their curriculum. A recent survey has point out that grade-9 pupils in Vietnam could only have approximately 4-5 practical lessons in comparisons with 60 lessons they totally have on a year education.
Nevertheless, there are also a myriad of solution in order to tackle this issue. First, it seems evident that the most essential solutions among those which are targeted to enhance the public’ awareness is definitely the official education. In particular, the authorities should make environment-related subjects compulsory at school in order to improve the students’ environmental awareness, which could result in their proper actions in the future. Second, by widely producing and broadcasting articles as well as videos on the social media, information about the natural habitats could easily approach to the citizens, as those kinds of media is extremely attractive to individuals. In fact, since climate change becomes more serious, articles and videos of this theme have been appearing with increasing frequency, capturing more inhabitants’ attention and providing them with basic knowledge of environmental problems.
In conclusion, even though the lack of knowledge about natural environment seems inevitable in today’s world, there are various methods to confront with it. Education and broadcasting videos on the social media could be two of the most useful way to tackle this issue.
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions 84
- Today many people do not realise how important the natural world is Why is this How can people learn more about the importance of the natural world 84
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 84
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management effectiv 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... articles and videos of this theme have been appearing with increasing frequency, capturing mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57660167131 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13328007027 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576601671309 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2794740446 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14309006597 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049527447489 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571700676367 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898105039422 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264312075594 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... articles and videos of this theme have been appearing with increasing frequency, capturing mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57660167131 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13328007027 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576601671309 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2794740446 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14309006597 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049527447489 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571700676367 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898105039422 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264312075594 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.