Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.

Recently, much attention has been drawn to the phenomenon that the living standard of metropolitan cities tends to get decreased. In this essay, the factors responsible for this problem will be discussed and the feasible solution will be proposed accordingly.

There are several factors contributing to this phenomenon. First of all, this problem can be attributed to the fact that citizens in megacities tend to live a hectic life nowadays. So fierce is the competition that working adults have no choice but to fully apply themselves to career development. It is conceivable that if employees slacken his or her efforts at self-improvement, he or she is doomed to be eliminated by the hot competition. As a result, they have no time to enjoy family time and to hang out with friends to socialize. Secondly, this issue is exacerbated by a bad lifestyle. To be specific, due to the piles of workload, working people tend to have a sedentary lifestyle. They sit in front of the computer all day and do not take regular exercise or stretch bodies, which poses a threat to both their physical and mental health. Last but not least, the environment in large cities becoming worse also lead to people there suffering from pollution-related diseases.

Accordingly, the solutions to this problem varied. To begin with, a healthy work style has much to do with employees’ lives, by reducing the excessive workload companies could help them find a way to strike a proper balance between work and life, which is beneficial to life quality improvement. For instance, staff can enjoy dinners with family members and have more time to play with their children if they can get off work earlier, which enhances their family relationships. In addition, working people should pay more attention to their lifestyles by making a conscious effort to take exercise regularly and to avoid sitting on the seat the whole day, and only in this way could their health condition get improved.

In conclusion, various factors cause the problem that citizens’ life quality in big cities is declining. But I believe that if they can carry out the measures mentioned above, they will address the issue in the foreseeable future.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05737704918 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96278312545 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571038251366 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4261666155 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.882352941 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104551515475 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329554503149 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609320978182 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075408957865 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434271161011 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.