In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is always important to have enough practical knowledge to get a better opportunity for job seekers in contrast to their professional qualifications. It is believed that in nearby years academic credits are calculated just as a paper value if people have better pragmatic ability. Initially, although the reasonable ability is important in many aspects, proper educational qualifications are indeed for every employee.
To start with, education provides most of the knowledge for students to develop their practical thinking. People could not achieve their goals irrespective of formal credentials. Good opportunities often offer to the job market with enough academic certificate holders, thereby people who have inborn practical talent may succeed in their careers widely. For example, multinational companies recruiting students with their academic value along with their instant performance.
Nevertheless, people would be able to achieve their goals with extra theoretical performance. Many start-ups are born with the adequate proficiency of their talent as computer skills, usage of advanced technologies and problem-solving skills. Even though without appropriate educational certification people would suffer in their future life to cope up with the advancement. As a result along with the practical knowledge people must need appropriate certification or qualification.
To sum up, job market seeking the aspirants who have enough reasonable thinking even though standard education is mandatory now and even in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...echnologies and problem-solving skills. Even though without appropriate educational certifi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92376681614 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19979588723 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591928251121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5902559289 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.083333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145016355682 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599529864031 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509382164719 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951876760787 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300419680188 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.