In today’s job market, it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often considered that practical skills are becoming more valuable for employment than theoretical knowledge. I partially agree with the statement and think that both practical experience and formal qualification are equally important in the job market.
In my view, practical skills are important for operating a business successfully in the market. Since, improvements in performance can only be achieved through work experience, business organizations are often in the need of practically experienced employees. So, in the job market, a practically skilled candidate is given more opportunities rather than a qualified candidate. For example. When hiring a designer, manager look for those who have sufficient working experience in the related field. Hence, qualifications of people are often neglected when it comes to employment.
However, practical skills can only be achieved using theoretical knowledge. In other words, a person who is deprived of education and holds no any formal qualifications, it is impossible for him/her to work or gain skills in the related field. Thus, every person first needs to be educated or earn degrees and can only begin working on the basis of the knowledge learned. Teachers are prime example who are formally required to possess educational qualifications to start teaching even if they have previous working experience. So, the role of theoretical knowledge in the job market is still significant.
In conclusion, although I agree that practical skills play a valuable role for job applicants, I would also argue that practically skilled manpower wouldn’t exist without the achievement of theoretical knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... who is deprived of education and holds no any formal qualifications, it is imposs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, look, so, still, thus, for example, in conclusion, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62845849802 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24122240225 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557312252964 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6814405401 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.538461538 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305005398113 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107136067108 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807934541594 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211622974554 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544061581527 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.