In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, it has been argued by many people that having practical skills are more crucial for a job applicant than theoretical knowledge. They believe that in the next few years there may not be a need for job applicants to have any academic certificates. Personally, I totally disagree with this point of view, and in this essay I will discuss the reasons.
First of all, theoretical knowledge is extremely important for people who are planning to enter the workplace. It is considered as the basis upon which they can build extra knowledge, and thus gain experience to excel in their field whatever their profession is. Without such knowledge, they may not be able to learn any practical skills. Take the engineering profession as an example. It is almost impossible for an engineer to learn practical skills necessary for the workplace only by practicing and without any intense studying at college.
Secondly, the academic certificates are the best way according which employers can choose their employees. If the candidates were not asked for formal qualifications, firms, for instance, would not be able to select the most appropriate workers among others. Academic qualifications always give accurate information about what a person has learned and what his specialty is, and that is how companies become able to select future employees according to their needs.
To conclude, although many people think that formal qualifications may not be a prerequisite in the future job applications, I disagree with this view point as I believe that the robust knowledge is the key for a person to excel in his career and for employees to select a new staff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Sagar Gurung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | Tran Mai Phuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | rania sayed ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | rania sayed ahmed | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Muhammed_10 | 78 | view |
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that development of business results in a loss of cultural ties between countries Other people contradict this belief Give your opinion 86
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 78
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can ba taken to tackle this problem? 56
- Some people feel that it is necessary to test new medicines on animals while other people feel that this is not fair on animals and not necessary Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thout any intense studying at college. Secondly, the academic certificates are ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for employees to select a new staff.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12454212454 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93570491052 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4268925282 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.583333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219683182279 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823438954577 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866396087617 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137312213992 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963587460676 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.