In today’s times, the internet is making it easy to study online from home. Some prefer online courses to study and they think it is better. Others prefer classroom education.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this era, sophisticated technology brings many benefits to our education method. Many people believe that online learning is the best way for their children due to the pandemic era. Meanwhile, others choose offline learning as the main option. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the argument and give my opinion.
On the one hand, those who support e-learning cite the various benefits to children. These range from flexibility of time and affordable tuition fees, it offers the opportunity to attend the class according to their wishes at any time and to study anywhere in the world. If we compare it to a classic class, learning from home is more competitive and convenient than this class because they can access the open sources easily. Moreover, the coronavirus cannot transmit to minors. As a result, parents are able to supervise their children carefully since they will be safe.
By contrast, opponents of this view point out that classroom training is the perfect place. Learning from class builds up the social development of the learners. They directly meet their peers and pedagogical experts teachers in the class. Then not only do they interact with their classmates in group discussion or in extracurricular activities, but also they can study under the supervision of the teacher. Since teacher-led lessons could be combined with student-led lessons, it will efficiently assimilate knowledge from them.
To sum up, it seems advisable that the decision to take offline learning is the best method to increase academic achievement from the minors, rather than on a general view that distance learning should be taken by children if the number of covid-19 decreases. It would appear that classroom learning is more beneficial than internet-based learning.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, then, while, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23693379791 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79937348064 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630662020906 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4051437129 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166304227919 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485335701738 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360240550115 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930055623804 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023493636269 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.