Today single use products are still very common What are the problems associated with this What are some possible solutions

Increasing consumption of single-time use products creates a negative impact on the environment. Government should make strict law against the use of hazardous products, which has detrimental effects on the Earth. This essay shall discuss the causes behind this phenomenon and suggested preferable solutions.

To commence with, a predominant reason behind this situation is an increment in the use of plastic. Plastics have disadvantageous effects on the Planet as it creates plenty of pollution in the air and, it is a very lengthy process to destroy the wastage of plastics. Moreover, single time use plastic material consume at a higher level by people, which produces more wastage materials. Furthermore, a study also proved that the use of plastic has a detrimental effect on human health. To epitome, people who consume hot meals in a plastic packing material, cause diseases such as cancer.

On the other hand, people can use cotton bags which have no negative impact on the environment and much more durable compared with plastic. Furthermore, the masses can use recycling products such as metal, glass, and mixed paper. What is more, people can follow the law which is made by the government and, it should be implemented well. Citizens who disobey the law must be penalized highly so that they can understand the value of the environment. Besides, law-enforcement agencies should apply heavy taxes on the use of plastic, so that fewer people would prefer to use this source.

To close the discussion, single-time use products hurt the environment, the government should encourage people to use recycle eco-friendly material.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, moreover, so, well, such as, what is more, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29885057471 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93042590031 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2701410789 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.7857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176550351123 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647251677362 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402682542381 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116029369671 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01428378597 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.