In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
In recent few decades, science and technology has advanced with leaps and bounds. Meanwhile, traditional artists also kept progressing in unique styles to create valuable songs, paintings and books. This essay will provide a clearer look at the true meaning of arts to our life compared to science and technology.
To begin with, there are numerous benefits of science and technology in modern days. One of these worth mentioning is that, this great advancement helps people to produce their creation much faster and more precisely. To enumerate, today sophisticated computers are used to check, create, and enhance the various forms of art in no time. For example, EDM musicians have been using computers to make songs in just limited time, and even some are created within 24 hours. Moreover, producers now have access to an enormous online library where they can learn new useful techniques and ideas, again thanks to the advance of technology. Today modern artists do not need to put serious efforts as they can just let the computer get the jobs done with the new artificial intelligence.
However, with all the perks, the value of products made by the help of technology is still far from traditional arts. Firstly, it requires real talents and ultimate effort to create these types of arts although it does takes longer for old school artists. Therefore, these arts have much higher values. For instance, a painting called “Guru Nanak Dev Ji” is now the most wanted by museums because it took famous painter Sobha Singh 2 months creating it. Secondly, since artists need to experience and wait for inspiring moment to capture, their final products are always more meaningful because they are close to real life. Last but not least, unlike technology-made arts which are stiff and formulaic, traditional ones express the artists’ emotion and inspiration.
In conclusion, even though the fact that science and technology have advanced significantly in today’s world, traditional arts still offer great values to the audience in their unique ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Anoopben | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Mario Nese | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | TOANTRAN | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | huynhhongtram | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | lamnhathuy | 89 | view |
- In some countries young people do not take care of their elderly relatives Instead they appoint trained professionals who take care of elderly Is it positive or negative trend according to you 75
- Many people think that home cooked food is healthy but many people still prefer eating out Why is this so 73
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment? 89
- Nowadays for many people the internet is replacing regular books What do you think will happen in the future and what is your opinion about this trend 73
- Some people think that it is more important to plant more trees in open area in towns and cities than building more housing To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23652694611 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68414634753 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652694610778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6593584316 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279682922693 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843184919509 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693721418803 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187645692841 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066367367819 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.