Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree?

Essay topics:

Topic: Many believe that individuals can do nothing to improve the environment. Only governments and big companies can make a difference. Agree or Disagree?

Many people think that preventing environmental degradation is the responsibility of national authorities and large enterprises instead of individuals. I totally disagree with this idea because of two main reasons.

Each person can combat the biological crisis because of the effect of their daily behaviors to companies and industrial zones which discharge chemical wastes to the environment. By reducing the dependence on fossil fuels and un-biodegradable products like plastic bags, which affects enterprises’ profit, manufacturing factories are likely to stop to produce these goods to the market. Furthermore, their claims incredibly influence on policies of the government which adopt official bans on destruction natural resources.

Everyone can make a big difference, provided that they aware of the green movement. This means that if each person improves their awareness of preserving the environment, the community can achieve sustainable developments. Take Vietnam as a prime example in the power of a person directly effect on society. With a journey throughout Vietnam, a teacher named Thang had shared about the need of alternative energy resources to society, leading to increasing plenty of people who utilize wind and solar energies rather than fossil fuels like coal. As a result, if almost all people give their hand in taking action on environmental problems, it alleviates the burden of authorities’natural resources protection.

In conclusion, individuals play as an integral role in pretending environmental destruction. Without each of the people, the national and local authorities and large companies are not possible to make the grade in their policies.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-31 Hien16698 89 view
2019-12-31 Hien16698 61 view
2019-12-31 Hien16698 61 view
2019-12-31 Hien16698 61 view
2019-12-31 Hien16698 78 view
Essays by user Hien16698 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 694, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... the burden of authorities'natural resources protection. In conclusion, individual...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77290836653 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4282816439 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653386454183 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3766051385 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185040964454 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065788193233 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06341691982 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981360492278 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219533479757 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.