Topic: Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes
Foreign tourism is often thought to have negative effects on the host country. There are a number of reasons for this opinion, however measurements can be done in order to solve the situation.
International tourism may get the most criticism for the effects on the environment. Tourists often bring snacks or any packaged products along on their trip. After finishing devouring the snacks, they may irresponsibly discard the packages onto the streets. This paves the way for soil pollution, also water contamination if the rubbish is thrown into the oceans or rivers. This act also prevents attempts to reduce waste of the local community from keeping the area clean and beautiful. Furthermore, tourism is responsible for jeopardising the traditions of the host country. Many tourists may be insensitive to the customs and ignore the feelings of the local residents. For example, Asian nations bear a dressing code for sacred places such as pagodas and temples. However, some foreign tourists still dress in inappropriate clothes, exposing their skin, and this somehow is an insult to the tradition of the country.
Nevertheless, by adopting solutions, the situation may easily be improved. The government should encourage their citizens to have an open mind on this problem, since tourism is indeed a huge profit earner for a country, and by participating in, local residents do get benefits. Additionally, tourists should be aware of culture differences and measurements should be done to encourage them to get rid of trash correctly.
In conclusion, there can be many ways to explain why the negative attitudes towards international tourism exist. However in my opinion, the government plays an important role on changing the situation for both local residents and tourists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | Tinh Cao Van | 61 | view |
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes? 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Topic: Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ult to the tradition of the country. Nevertheless, by adopting solutions, the...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them to get rid of trash correctly. In conclusion, there can be many ways to...
^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...es towards international tourism exist. However in my opinion, the government plays an ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35460992908 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9649122572 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581560283688 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.601763756 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215346439235 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706878591491 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605681918871 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139365611947 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468545210119 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.