Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?

Essay topics:

Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?

Many museums and historical spectacles are the main attractions for tourists but for local residents. This essay will explain more about the reasons and the solutions to appeal to them to the places as much as to the overseas tourists.
There are specific causes for such a huge difference in the number of the two kinds of visitors. First of all, people living in the neighboring areas seem to have got accustomed to their history. Travelling to these places will be a waste of time and money due to the travelling, food, entrance and tour guide costs. People there would not be likely to be willing to pay so large an amount of money to observe what they have already known. Meanwhile, international tourists have a tendency to pay a visit in those places to further their knowledge and experience the region’s customs. Secondly, in order to maintain the historical meaning of the sites, the buildings must be remained unchanged, which can be unattractive to the local residents.
Some solutions can be put forward to encourage more local people to visit historical places. One solution is to create more entertainment grounds with traditional games. The second solution is to describe the items they are observing to increase their knowledge. The third solution is decreasing the cost which is too high for local people. Furthermore, the places can be decorated and installed some furniture to increase the visitors’ comfort.
In conclusion, the major causes for the disinterest of the local people in historical places are the time, cost, interior and outsider parts of the places, which are mentioned above. Actions should be proceeded to gain local people’s attraction to such places.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-23 Tinh Cao Van 73 view
2019-01-23 Tinh Cao Van 73 view
Essays by user Tinh Cao Van :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, while, as to, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11071428571 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87793993428 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4211914443 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159319146533 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561929913409 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345110227545 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102707045465 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026789871243 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.