Topic: Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people hold a belief that thanks to their fortunate, people can achieve their goals with flying colors. Although it is true that reaching the aims partly depends on their luck, I contend that hard work and self-discipline also play an important role in creating success.
One major ground behind the reason why many people believe in luck when it comes to obtaining objectives is the favorable conditions in luck pave the way for people to reach their targets. In fact, people who were born in wealthy families will have more opportunities to experience an ideal environment for growth holistically. Not only be supplied with nutritious diets but also a dynamic and engaging study environment, thereby contributing to creating a brighter future for them with a potential career path. In addition, regarding running a business, in several circumstances, it mostly depends on luck, particularly in terms of real estate. For instance, in 2018, almost all land in Vietnam was valuable, even considered as a key asset to business, witnessing rocket growth in the future. However, after over a year, due to being influenced seriously by both covid-19 pandemic and the economic downturn, land slumped dramatically, leading numerous companies to run out of business.
Nevertheless, external key factors should be taken into consideration to help people obtain their objectives. First and foremost, extraordinarily hard-working and unwavering dedication is crucial to accomplishing milestones. To give an example, the President of the United States, Lincoln was a nominated person. Despite growing up in a poverty-stricken family, by his determination, courage, and persistence for many years, he succeeded in becoming a well-known lawyer at this time, fighting against various alarming social issues, and being supported to become the 16th President of the USA. Consider Thomas Edison, who failed a thousand times before successfully inventing the world-changing light bulb.
In conclusion, the influence of luck on success cannot be dismissed. However, I maintain that hard work and patience hold greater importance in the pursuit of goals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-30 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | briona2006 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Rosie Holmes | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Rosie Holmes | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | minh phương phạm hồng | 78 | view |
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive What are your opinions on this 84
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 89
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 61
- Topic The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48942598187 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14984494376 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670694864048 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0125625851 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0963143368791 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312717881473 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368861582174 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615817458285 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425298938709 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.