Tourism is always a force for good which enables people of different countries to understand each other To what extent do you agree with this idea You should give reasons for your answer and include ideas and examples from your own knowledge and experienc

Tourism in the world today is widely debated, with some people claiming that it is indeed a force for international understanding. However, I personally do not agree with statement I will explain why in this following essay.

Firstly, there are some potential negatives of contact between two culture. Tourism drags people to explore different countries. In addition, their stay causes pollution for local societies. For instance, ecological damage can be seen in the sanctuaries of Africa because of increasing number of sightseers. Furthermore, there are numerous example of tension between tourists and local culture, ranging from north coast to south coast. Moreover, sometimes it can be seen that it also affect local religion and religious belief . Consequently , tourism leads distrust between two nationalities, not better understanding.

On the other hand, by looking through economical perspective t improves international relationship. This is manly because of flowing currency from wealthy country to less developed countries. In reality, however, wealth usually stays in the hands of private sectors or local officials, rarely finds into the population. For example, many of us visited less developed nations as visitors, and have witnessed of the poverty that exists outside the our stay. We leave and realized that our stay has contributed nothing to the lives of those we have observed.

Overall, this is not to say that tourism is entirely bad. There are benefits in terms of improving local infrastructure such as road and airports. But to say that it is always a force for good is to ignore the various problems it causes.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Tourism in the world today is widely debated, with some people clai...
^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...fect local religion and religious belief . Consequently , tourism leads distrust b...
^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gion and religious belief . Consequently , tourism leads distrust between two nati...
^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... On the other hand, by looking through economical perspective t improves intern...
^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...ssed of the poverty that exists outside the our stay. We leave and realized that our st...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3992248062 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97101132344 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7317791445 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.9411764706 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140580291281 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420019400138 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421088257218 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890567299015 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359765444239 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.