Tourism plays an important role in the development of many countries, especially nations filled with beautiful destinations and natural landscapes. However, tourism is adversely affecting the natural environment on a global scale. This essay will explicate its main causes and provide effective solutions.
To commence with, several factors are contributing to environmental problems these days. One of these consequences is the loss of natural habitat and wildlife species. As tourism grows up, many people flock to beautiful natural landscapes. Enterprises have wiped out spacious local areas for building infrastructure such as shopping malls, resorts, hotels etc, disturbed local wildlife. All of these have led to a decrease in the habitat areas and a plummet in the wildlife population. For instance, tourism has resulted in the degradation of coral reeds in the Caribbean regions, leading numerous marine species to lose their homes. Furthermore, tourism often puts pressure on natural resources through over-consumption, often in places where resources are already scarce. Due to the excessive exploitation of local natural resources, the native soil has become too barren to cultivate, as well as the water being overused and contaminated. All of these aspects have caused the gradual destruction of environmental resources and ecological imbalance.
What local authorities can do to help protect the environment is to raise awareness among tourists about the importance of the ecological balance and the environmental health. Only by understanding the significant role of the environment can travelers willingly join hands in protecting it. Another effective method is to enact stricter regulations regarding littering particularly in popular destinations. The high effectiveness of fining litterbugs is demonstrated in the example of Singapore, where the trash can never be found in public places.
To sum up, despite the economic benefits, tourism still has detrimental impacts on the environment. However, with the efforts made by the locals and travelers, its severe results can be mitigated.
- Some people think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some think that people are responsible for their happiness Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- Problems with environmental pollution have become so serious that many countries are trying to solve these problems Suggest possible solutions and give your opinion 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, as for, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76038338658 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20284313162 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8832747671 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.166666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160970773227 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457682517318 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546395272377 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851152681849 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365794839007 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, as for, as to, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76038338658 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20284313162 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8832747671 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.166666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160970773227 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457682517318 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546395272377 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851152681849 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365794839007 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.