The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
Family meals has been the most critical part of a family which cannot be missed in its everyday life. However, this tradition is fading off as time proceeds. This essay will have a deep look into the causes as well as cannot-neglect consequences it leaves to families.
Inevitably, thank to the market competing society, the habit of family meals gradually disappears. Companies nowadays are looking for strategies to maintain their productivity and get ahead of one another. This results in not only the employees but as well the CEO have so spend most of their time working and apparently, they often work overtime or even work at home so that the daily targets and revenues are hit. They end up having no time for either preparing meals at home so as to mention having the meal with their families. Besides, more restaurants and and fast food stores are opened to meet busy people's need and this unintentionally takes away the chances for family meals.
Since people are overwhelmed with their work, hardly can they aware that the loss of the critical family meal are extremely detrimental. Firstly, as this is the only time where all the family members can share their daily ups and downs and parents can pass down meaningful lessons to their offspring. Such disappearance results in less sharing which perhaps, evolves to misunderstanding and eventually, can exacerbate to family break ups. Besides, homemade meals are considered to be the most hygienic and nutritious which can only be prepared at home. In other words, frequent consumption of food outside, especially fast food consequently leads to a few critical health problems such as obesity or diarrhea. Hence, not only does the disappearance of family dinners weaken the bonding of families, but also pose a threat to the health of the people.
In conclusion, nothing can equate the tradition of having a family meal in all aspects. However, this tradition is still going against time and will soon be vanished.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | nhathoa | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ngotrancamtu | 61 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 67
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 479, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...time for either preparing meals at home so as to mention having the meal with their fami...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 560, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ir families. Besides, more restaurants and and fast food stores are opened to meet bus...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, so, still, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08787878788 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75067568292 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554545454545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4926683561 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128871185799 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514009730775 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413677113729 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094925312586 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240745697025 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.