The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
In recent decade, the frequency of family gathering together to have meals is rarely seen. Therefore, this essay will put forward some explanation and analysis of the potential impact.
The fact that changed family’s eating habits could be attributed to three major reasons. Firstly, due to the difference of work and study schedule among family’s members that they cannot be able to come home at the same time and have meals together. Secondly, heavy workload and hectic schedule are required when dealing with a fast and chaotic rhythm of life, hence everyone intends to eat fast food while they are at work. Last but not least, the fast food culture had revolutionized that leads to the available when buying food everywhere.
From my stand, this phenomenon may lead to both beneficial and detrimental consequences. In term of eating fast food, we can be flexible in our timetable to solve some urgent problems easier. In the other hands, the disappearance of this tradition may result in the lack of interconnection between family members. Since they no longer get together for meals, they will not be able to share their stories and be separated from others which is a cause for isolation living. The misunderstanding between parents and their children would be increased due to the less of sharing. Moreover, the fading of bonding between family members caused a negative impact on the society. For instance, in special occasion, people do not feel the need for family reunion since the distance between family’s members and theses occasion may be forgotten in the future.
In conclusion, the family reunion while having meals is likely to be forgotten recently that could lead to both positive and negative impact on people and the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | nhathoa | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ngotrancamtu | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... available when buying food everywhere. From my stand, this phenomenon may lead ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14532871972 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76511943068 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5551909919 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164223790184 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587606920827 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436987370427 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10883854776 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224754656165 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.