The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing.
What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
It is no undeniable to say that the tradition of having meals together in a family is fading away in recent years. This statement can be answered by various reasons which cause significant effects on health, and especially family life.
There are two main explanation answering the question of why family members no longer eating together. Firstly, the bonds between members in a family are disappearing because parents have to deal with their jobs such as meeting after work, go on businesses, or maybe working overtime to feed the whole family, raising their children. Secondly, some children are impatient waiting for meals with family. And to deal with this problem, many parents decide to let them eat earlier in front of the TV, computer or smartphone, which create a habit for both children and parents.
These reasons can create negative effects on children’s health, and especially family life. In terms of children’s health, family meal is the best opportunity to consume healthy diets for all members in a family since it is made by parents, who have experiences in buying fresh products and cooking healthy and delicious cooks. Without this routine, youngsters will choose snacks, fast foods, which lead to some deceases such as diabetes, obesity. From the family life perspective, the best way to connect family members is sitting in a table, having a meal, share their daily life and give guidance to everyone in the family, leading to a strong and stable bonds between members in a family. If people no longer maintain this habit, these connections will fade away, parents will lose control to their children, and children will feed that their parents are no longer care them anymore, which might drive them into criminal road.
In conclusion, numerous reasons can be named out to answer why people are no longer having meals with their families like they used to be. And these causes can bring serious result to every individuals, families, and maybe to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-10 | trần ngọc tuấn | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 73 | view |
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: IT_IS_NO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'not' or 'now'?
Suggestion: not; now
It is no undeniable to say that the tradition of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03647416413 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51553868705 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55623100304 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.615912799 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.461538462 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152058414011 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644298425346 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506670837617 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110591133703 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445392996571 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.