The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
It is true that the disappearance of family traditional meal is happening. This essay will discuss some reasons behind this issue and discuss some effects that it could have on family life and health.
To begin with, the issue can be attributed to a number different factors. The primary would be the economic pressures that parents encounter as they are not able to balance their company-work and house-work in a single day. This might be because of the large amount of company task that parents have to face which cause a lot of time to finish. For example, in families with working mother, it is impossible to arrange times to visit out-door market and prepare a meal when they have to work 8 hours per day. Another contributing factor to this could be the parents pampered behavior with their children as they allow them to have their meal in front of the TV or sitting in front of the computer without any face-to-face interaction. It is understandable that parents always want the best thing for their child; however, this action may cause some negative impacts.
There are a range of problems when the family traditional meal disappears. The main problem is that it will be much more difficult in shaping children’s personality during their formative years as parents cannot spend enough time to understand their behaviors and characteristics. Family mealtimes are critical because these are a time for family members to share news, give guidance and discuss about plans; without it, children mentality will be affected. It has been shown that, children without having meal without family faces some troubles communicating with other people as well as expressing their emotion. Another issue is that children cannot have enough energy as their parents cannot control their diet. Children can easily to have obesity which often result from not having a balanced diet. Family meals can be a chance to provide children a healthier diet by giving them a fresh amount of food.
In conclusion, the above-mentioned facts have outlined the reasons as well as the impacts of this issue, this is a complex matter and there are a number of contributing factors to it. Considering the unwanted effects it may cause, some concerted efforts should be taken soon in order to tackle this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98694516971 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67692916051 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516971279373 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3484013902 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.352941176 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5294117647 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111623049246 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537489887642 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791286075018 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867602973678 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580756768525 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.