The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies?

Essay topics:

The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies?

It is true that, many families are abandoned the traditional way of communion like cook and eat together. The exact cause to say that industrialization and globalization and the effect on to the society and family would be detrimental. Such as, lack of inter personal relationship and extinction of many cultures and family back bone believes.

Initially, hectic working schedule in employments area lead to failure connection with family and friends. In brief, nowadays, most of the family members especially young generations are working far away from home or studying abroad. parents often get contact with children through Skype, or any other social media sites. Probably, vacation has been limited and eating and chatting together inhibited to very seldom. Moreover, peoples are addicted to the impact of innovative gadgets like cellphones and tablets than being together in a group of family members or siblings to share secrets and funs. For instance, study reports explain from university of Melbourne, young generation was involved in about 14 hours in a day to chat or watch social sites and mingle with others other than family members.

However, predominant adverse effect of this phenomenon that would be a psychological crisis and failure of certain cultural progress and society precedence. In other words, in turn of congregation failure lead to lack of intimacy, untold stories of family members, and sometimes unknowing cousins make loneliness in future. Similarly, many cultural celebrations of family and society become endangered and forthcoming generations could not touch or hear the secret value of such things. Furthermore, inability to share and express the feelings and sorrows to the close relatives during on table togetherness eventually affect the mental and emotional connections to each other. For example, escalating old age homes emphasize the pernicious effect of lack of amalgamation of close associates.

To conclude, make use of assimilation of family or society members are declining today by the effect of modernization. In fact, such trend often reduce the connectivity and sincerity to among members of the family and community which would be unfavorable to everyone.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-11 RyanHoang190398 89 view
2019-10-14 Shaibal das 61 view
2019-02-20 TrucNgoc 78 view
2018-11-11 mostafa jahangiri 61 view
2018-09-13 mary.ssherr 89 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Parents
... far away from home or studying abroad. parents often get contact with children through...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'seldom' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...and chatting together inhibited to very seldom. Moreover, peoples are addicted to the ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s like cellphones and tablets than being together in a group of family members or...
^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...times unknowing cousins make loneliness in future. Similarly, many cultural celebrations ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... during on table togetherness eventually affect the mental and emotional connecti...
^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which would be unfavorable to everyone.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, similarly, so, for example, for instance, in brief, in fact, such as, in other words, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.472303207 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97237148126 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603498542274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9229061649 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.3125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236408907401 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765770004753 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427585587888 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145839999544 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387102263626 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.