Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion
It is often argued that by moving big manufacturers and factories and their workers to the small towns and suburbs can housing and traffic issues in cities be solved. In my opinion, however, this methodology is useful to a certain extent and there are several actions could be done.
On the one hand, transferring work places and the employees in big cities to the countryside has played a certain role in solving transportation and housing problems. To be more specific, there will be a significant decline in the number of people commuting from and to work on a daily basis. This results in a decrease in the carbon dioxide emissions from transportation releasing to the atmosphere. Furthermore, people are less likely to fritter away their time looking for appropriate homes and paying for the fees of house renting.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that there are several actions that could be done to mitigate these potential problems other than applying this way. The first solution to reduce traffic would be changing our working habits. For example, the Internet can be utilized to connect people so they can work from home and have flexible timetables; meetings can be held as video conferences. Another measure would be tax drivers. In London, for instance, there is a congestion charge which has helped a lot in raising money for better public transport. Moreover, the authorities should advertise public transport as reliable and efficient through social media. Finally, fees of housing for hiring should be given discount for those who are far from homes.
In conclusion, although I agree that moving large companies and factories to non-city places exerts profound impacts upon environment and housing issues, I personally reckon that other positive actions could be taken including changing working habits, imposing taxes, raising awareness about public transport and reducing housing fees.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-12 | gulbakhyt_90 | 56 | view |
- 1.People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- 3.Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views 89
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 65
- Cycling is a healthy and environmentally friendly form of transport. Nevertheless, cycling is getting less popular. What are the reasons of this trend? What can be done to make cycling more popular? 61
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22402597403 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72251246594 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587662337662 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5205607237 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255056011633 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806370377961 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644519603298 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17365451906 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682185301622 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.