Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities.
In the contemporary world, traffic congestion is a principal problem facing big cities. This essay will first suggest promoting work from home model and charging a congestion fee as viable solutions.
The culprit for this is that there has been a growing tendency for people dwelling in the urban areas to work in major cities and hence, the number of private vehicles has significantly increased here. Nonetheless, it requires no tedious analysis to reminisce that to rectify this phenomenon; every car should be charged a congestion fee when they want to get into the city center. Hopefully, this deters them from driving to work and use public transportation. A classic case of which is London, where each driver has to pay 8 pounds for entrance.
Secondly, it is incumbent upon authority to provide feasible ameliorate by promoting work from home model. Realistically, the advance in technology has made it possible for employees to work effectively even from their private space. For instance, people could keep their team working together through an app called Zoom, where they can start video calls right from their room. This may, in effect, reduce car usage in the city center. As mirrored by a recent public awareness campaign in Vietnam that encourage more people to become telecommute and this, result in a drastic improvement.
Subsequently, weighing all the aforementioned, it can now safely stated that this disturbing situation can be tackled by charging drivers who want to enter the city center and by encouraging people to become a telecommuter. It is predicted that more and more major cities will be forced to take this measure to curtail this dilemma.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-17 | Ngo Minh Chau | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | Ngo Minh Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | Ngo Minh Chau | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | kalampeet | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mtr6510 | 78 | view |
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 92
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st Century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions 61
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or to work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your 78
- Some people think job satisfaction is more important than job security But others believe that people can not always enjoy their jobs and having a permanent job is more important Discuss both view and give your opinon 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this, result in a drastic improvement. Subsequently, weighing all the aforement...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this measure to curtail this dilemma.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13503649635 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84023452824 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8918900869 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.230769231 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223565822925 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760129588012 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615679289844 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13558408842 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334228767142 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this, result in a drastic improvement. Subsequently, weighing all the aforement...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this measure to curtail this dilemma.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13503649635 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84023452824 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8918900869 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.230769231 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223565822925 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760129588012 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615679289844 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13558408842 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334228767142 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.