Travell to remote places
In recent years, the researchers or travellers are able to discover the remote and nature destinations on the planet such as poles and jungle. While I accept that these journeys can bring undeniable benefits to our life, I believe that they are more likely to have a negative impact.
On the one hand, there are good reasons to explain for the positive effect of this development. Travelling to the common places seems to be quite ordinary in our society. Recently, the trend of travelling to the remote environment develops significantly as it can bring a new and strange kind of experience they have never had in their life. Moreover, going to these places is possible to offer a golden opportunity to learn new things or skills, improve ourself and uncover the hidden secrets around those environments. For example, when tourists make a journey to the north pole, they can apply their survival skills in the real-life situations, learn how to respect and enjoy the brilliant beauty of nature and enhance their ability of solving sudden problems. Addtionally, this type of journey also creates a chance for travellers and researchers to recognize where their limit is and get through challenges to push up their horizon.
However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by its disadvantages. The natural and remote environment usually has the severe conditions such as: extremely high or low temperature, dangerous wild animals and wide range of diseases. Therefore, the health of scientists and travellers is likely to be influenced and threaten in a long term. Moreover, in these no-people environments, there are many potential dangers which can happen suddenly at any point of time in traveller’s journey. If they do not have a greatly careful preparation and enough indispensable skills to survive, they maybe lose their live due to lack of the outside support. Unlike other species, human being always leave their waste discharged from daily activities any places they come. Therefore, if scientists and travellers go to these destinations in a long period, their activities can damage the natural balance and affect the ecosystem in these ones.
In conclusion, it is true that the drawbacks of travelling to remote areas are higher than its potential benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-26 | Phan Thị Minh Thiện | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 933, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...ral balance and affect the ecosystem in these ones. In conclusion, it is true that the dr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17250673854 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89601788585 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582210242588 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0325394784 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.9375 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269424191468 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873239154225 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081575363091 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181519927756 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351568921243 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.