Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words
In recent year, there are many people who believe conserving wildlife runs the risk of being extinct is squander of value resources. My opinion is completely contrary to this conception and in this essay I will give some examples to support my view.
To begin with, the beneficial of saving wildlifes bring for humans life that is environmental regulation. Wildlife conservation have been an important significance for regulating and appreciating the quality of environment. For example, There was a decrease of eagles and falcons in the haft 20th century that was a strong warning about dangerous levels of DDT pesticide. That is being a sort of pesticide have been using widely and it has been might agglomerate in tissue of animal’s bodies. Hence will either impair their fertility or hatch the eggs of these animals. From that, it leads to impact for climate change and substances run polluted the environment. This is one of the reasons to promote wildlife conservation movement.
In addition, that is beneficial for agriculture. As can be seen, the farmers have tended to use insects to eradicate bugs damage crops. Furthermore, using crops containing natural ingredients are going to drive back the harmful insects. Thus that is a safe and effective method. It is less expensive than synthetic chemical drugs.
There are some mesure to protect wildlife such as preventing criminal trade wildlife on the internet, terminating storage bear and so on.
To summaries above mentioned points, the government should enforce effective measures and terminate illegal wildlife consumption situation on areas. Each person should change their views and behaviors to contribute value for our future generations.
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Reading for pleasure can develop imagination and language skills better than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree Media 73
- In some countries today many people decide to have their first child when they are older What are the reasons Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people believe it is necessary but others think that it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinions 89
- In some countries today many people decide to have their first child when they are older What are the reasons Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 494, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...glomerate in tissue of animal’s bodies. Hence will either impair their fertility or h...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...oing to drive back the harmful insects. Thus that is a safe and effective method. It...
^^^^
Line 10, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ibute value for our future generations.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, sort of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38518518519 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89435380536 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655555555556 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8266918148 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5294117647 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0716706003645 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0214243314096 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228699023904 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0300373904559 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274565207364 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.