The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At present, it is estimating that the style of a typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will modify until 2050. Obviously, I completely agree with this notion and express my opinion in the following paragraphs with some principal examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, it is indisputable fact that the teaching methods and its situation were extremely different to compare to the present day in the past. For instance, there were not any modern desks and chairs for the students, and they studied at the pool. Mainly because some spheres like craftsmanship were not completely developed in that period. The teachers wrote to a board with the help of chalks, and the students wrote to the diminutive woods by a plumage of the birds. Therefore, time and human knowledge play a colossal role in the human span.
On the other hand, today, there is a plethora of prosperous conditions for both, students and teachers in the class. For example, teachers can utilize the modern screens which assist them to explain everything by the photos and other details to their pupils, and students have their own books, notebooks, as well as colored pens and pencils. However, the scientists suppose that there will be the technological robots instead of qualified tutors who can give quality education to pupils, then, the students do not utilize books, pens, instead of this they will use up to age planchets and such kind of gadgets in 2050. Furthermore, our golden future will be exactly various in the next few decades.
In conclusion, it is evident that the effective labor and education of humanity can modify the upcoming future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-24 | Roy An | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | moledro | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | Sprios_D | 78 | view |
- Nuclear energy 73
- In many countries women and men are working full time It is therefore logical for women and men to share household works To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The line graph below shows oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 56
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65994475929 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0311805555 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221300645856 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727170624024 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986920706272 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115957594117 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927341057195 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.