The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether the recent reality which a teacher takes care of a number of students in the class is still aligned with the trend of education development remains a topic of debate. While some argue that this method exerts several advantages on students’ academic performance, I strongly agree with the statement that there will be unexpected changes until the year 2050 in the absence of this situation.
On the one hand, there are several significant drawbacks to this phenomenon. First and foremost, one teacher is unable to control and capture students’ information in class, leading to neglecting to understand their psychological changes and behaviors. The implication of this is that when some students are exposed to social evils and had irreversible negative impacts on their lives, it is a challenge for the teacher to tackle these problems. Additionally, the overload of a teacher in this typical teaching method exacerbates the disparity among students and the lack of knowledge curtails the weak students’ studying enthusiasm.
On the other hand, it is undeniable the success of some innovative teaching methods applied in several regions worldwide. To exemplify, the teaching approach centering on students and increasing the number of teachers in class have been implemented in my hometown. A small group of students will receive more detailed instruction from the teacher to foster their equal abilities. As a result, authorities also have planned to broaden this scheme to other schools in the near future.
In conclusion, amid some challenges in enhancing and developing new teaching methods, there are reasons for optimism. I strongly believe in the prospect of these approaches in eradicating the situation with a teacher and students in the class soon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-24 | Roy An | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | moledro | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | Sprios_D | 78 | view |
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 61
- Children nowadays watch TV programmes more than ever before Is watching television good or bad for children 78
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The graph below shows the percentage of female students on four different course at one university from 1970 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether the recent reality which a teacher take...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36170212766 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97070010295 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549645390071 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3047982971 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260305684721 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894993375851 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593317613834 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155700814106 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00831305500061 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.