Universities should be concerned with educating people so that they have wide general knowledge and be able to consuder important matters from an informed view point and not simply prepare students for jobs required by society.Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether universities should focus on education which is support pupils to have a quality of general knowledge instead of focus on gaining a job in the future. It is put forward by some people that academies should be concerned with scholars' knowledge so that they can establish the solutions when the matters appeared. The opponents, on the other hand, argue that students should be acquired specific knowledge which can be utilised at their job position in the future. this essay will illustrate both viewpoints surrounding this issue before coming to a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, there are some people who hold the view that colleges should be concerned with learner’s wide general knowledge that they are able to consider crucial problems from an informed prospection. These people present several arguments, but the most conspicuous one is perhaps that people can quickly solve the problems when they have a wide range of information. In other words, they can expect the next situation from their knowledge. To illustrate, a chef who works in the kitchen should be educated about first aid, so that they can be flexible in responding to a dangerous incident. Another point often made by the proponents of this position is that people who have a wide knowledge could improve quality of life. This is because they are competitive and smarter than others who have a lack of knowledge. For example, people define that wealthy is well-knowledge people such as lawyers, politicians and doctors while poor people usually have a lack of knowledge.
On the other hand, there are opponents of this view as well. these people believe that students should be focused on their major subject which can support their job opportunity. One of the most convincing arguments they present is that some professional positions are required a specific deep knowledge which can save one’s life. This is evidenced by the fact that people cannot assure accidents. For instance, surgeons, nurses or fire-fighters should be expected a number of situations to protect patients and themselves from the emergency cases. As well as this, they believe that some other professionals who represent their nations such as Olympic players, world cup players do not require to gain unrelated part of pieces of knowledge.
To sum up, it can be observed that there are two contradicting viewpoints in relation to whether universities should be concerned with a wide range of education or not. To choose which side I am on, I believe that academics should support scholars to adapt with society as primary to high schools support basic knowledge.
- The charts show what the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the production of circuit boards Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 78
- People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests but based on the kinds of jobs they can get To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as South Pole.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- People in all modern societies use drugs, but today's youths are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs, and at an increasingly early age. Some sociologists claim that parents can do there members of society often set a bad example. Discuss 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 526, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ed at their job position in the future. this essay will illustrate both viewpoints s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e coming to a reasoned conclusion. On the one hand, there are some people w...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... usually have a lack of knowledge. On the other hand, there are opponents o...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ere are opponents of this view as well. these people believe that students should be ...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 700, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: gaining
...ayers, world cup players do not require to gain unrelated part of pieces of knowledge. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lated part of pieces of knowledge. To sum up, it can be observed that there...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 27.0 7.30460921844 370% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 440.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17954545455 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77848786838 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488636363636 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9887293548 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.947368421 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375641787997 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115842082331 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823636960258 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232972728183 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633134768875 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.