The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?
In today's extremely busy world, especially in big cities, having a car has become an essential part of many people's life. It offers flexibility and provides ready access to many work and leisure options. However, recently, a range of problems associating with the uncontrolled increase in use of cars have surface and need to be addressed. In this essay, I plan to identify those complicated problems and propose some feasible solutions to them.
Firstly, people using cars with dense ratios is one of the main causes to cities' catastrophic air qualities. Exhaust gas emitted by cars engine contains large proportions of poisonous gas such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, etc. and many more. These toxic chemical compounds can lead to air pollution and can be harmful to people's health if they are usually exposed to it, causing respiratory issues and even lung cancer. According to a study, exhausted gas from motors' engines in general is responsible for 30% of air pollution in Hanoi. The overuse of cars in big cities not only affect negatively on the environment, but also our own health.
Another negative aspect of using cars unlimitedly is traffic congestion. People have now gotten used to being stuck in seemingly inescapable jams. It is claimed that people often spend two to three hours to get home. Recently in Hanoi, we even experience traffic jams outside of rush hours.
To alleviate these problems, many people suggest the government to impose a strict restriction on the use of cars. However, from my point of view, this is not a suitable solution. Discouraging or forbidding people to use cars on certain days con result in a decline in the car manufacturing industry, which is one of the most important industry in some countries. Moreover, cars' mobility can be significantly helpful to people's life. To tackle this complex issue, the government should encourage cars manufacturers to come out with more environmentally-friendly and affordable car lines. Furthermore, improvements on the public transport system need to be made immediately, so that it attracts more people into using it instead of driving cars.
To sum up, though it is true that cars have played a crucial role in people's life ever since they were invented, the uncontrolled overuse of cars can be damaging to society by causing air pollution, traffic congestion and many more issues. In order to solve those problems, discouraging people to use cars is definitely not a permanent cure. Instead, we should make cars that run on solar or electrical energy and improve the public transport system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | claraa_ltn | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | gagandeep@13 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | trpg143 | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | trpg143 | 61 | view |
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people from using cars 84
- People generally know that the environment is important However most individuals still don t take responsibility to protect the environment Why is this What should ben done to encourage people to protect the environment 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 84
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 84
- Computers are increasingly used in education in which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to air pollution and can be harmful to peoples health if they are usually expos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in general, such as, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11007025761 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95217061377 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587822014052 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6091919768 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8695652174 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5652173913 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73913043478 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397054814871 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103461309809 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073007280783 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213851327657 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560892513193 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.